Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Are Mormons Passive Aggressive?


I am going to write something that will probably go against the grain, and may even produce conflict.  Why? Because I think there are lots of problems with the interpretation of MIchael J. Steven’s data showing Latter-day Saints in Weber county have a high preference for passive aggressive strategies of resolving potential conflict.


Stevens’ data are fascinating, if not surprising for anyone who has been observing Utah culture and, especially, LDS ways for a long time. Indeed, they correlate with work being d

Monday, March 24, 2014

Ideological Pressure and Social Science


As the bandwagon to censure Mark Regenerus and his work on marriage grows, following its harsh rejection by a MIchigan judge,  the hoard focuses on conservative funding of social science and attempts to create the appearance of a debate within the field for the purposes of public relations and for legal action.  Nevertheless, there is much more that should be considered. 

Let me first be a little personal.  In 1990 I went to Buenos Aires as a recently minted Ph.D., on a Fulbright grant, to help train a new generation of social scientists since their ranks had been decimated by the dirty wars, when voices raised in concern or opposition, and science that ran counter to official presumption, were silenced, often for good. At the time, it seemed to my naive self that the military government’s censoring of social science was a rare event. 

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Fraud Accusations, the Exception, and Mormonism: Thoughts on the Study of Religion



My newsfeed trumpeted this morning that the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints will not have to appear before a British magistrate to face fraud charges. From this news item surge issues that are analytically interesting, even without my having read the court documents. 

I am fascinated with the idea that religious preaching and organization could potentially be judged by transactional standards of fraud, or not. In either case, we see a division of the social world into different segments where divergent standards of evaluation ostensibly hold.